Friday, 28 May 1999 Washington, DC

1. COX REPORT: NO SPY NOVEL EVER HAD SO MANY PLOT TWISTS.
It's a 700-page insomnia treatment, except for two troubling questions. First, how did we learn the Chinese had stolen our top nuclear secrets? The answer, according to the Report, is that they told us. In 1995, a "walk-in" in a country outside the PRC gave the CIA hundreds of secret Chinese documents including the nuclear stuff. A year later the CIA determined that the walk-in was working for Chinese intelligence. That brings up the second question: Why would they tell the CIA? The report has no answer for that one, but theories abound. Cox suggests either Beijing was trying to intimidate Washington, or it was a dumb mistake. In intelligence circles, explanations are more devious. One is that it was an ancient Chinese tactic for sowing dissension by setting off a spy hunt. One purpose would be to stem the brain drain of top Chinese nuclear scientists who work at US labs after they complete graduate studies, in which case the plan may be working. Another explanation is that the secrets were actually disinformation the US had deliberately leaked to the PRC, and they were just sending it back to let us know they weren't fooled. A variant of this is that the PRC wasn't sure it was disinformation and sent it back to gauge US reaction. A further elaboration is that it really is disinformation and the Cox panel is part of an elaborate ruse to convince the PRC that it's real.

2. REACTION: THREE VIEWS ON THE REPORT.
Secretary Richardson said, "It's already out of date, 32 of the 36 recommendations have already been implemented. President Clinton, speaking at an Empowerment conference in South Texas, thanked the committee for its careful work. Behind him the backdrop read "Tapping America's Potential." That's exactly what China was doing! At a morning press conference, China's Ambassador, Li Zhaoxing, told a worried reporter, "It's the uninformed who are frightened, the nightmare is not true. Go to a good restaurant and have a sound sleep."

3. NASA: "THE PROMISE OF SPACE FLIGHT FOR AGING RESEARCH."
They got it backwards. On Wednesday, a NASA press conference featured John Glenn talking about his adventures in space. He was followed by a panel of academic scientists who gave an overview of the latest findings on aging research related to muscle atrophy, balance disorder, disrupted sleep and bone disease all done on the ground. This could benefit the space program drugs developed to treat osteoporosis in the elderly, for example, may help astronauts. There was little evidence, however, of benefits going the other way. Perhaps the press conference should have been titled "The Promise of Aging Research for Space Travel."



Bob Park can be reached via email at whatsnew@bobpark.org
THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND
Opinions are the author's and are not necessarily shared by the University, but they should be.