Friday, April 18, 1997

1. SPACE STATION: CLINTON PRESSURED TO ACT ON RUSSIAN DELAY.
The frustration of Congress over Russia's failure to meet its commitments to the International Space Station boiled over this week when the Science Committee took up H.R. 1275, the Civilian Space Authorization Act of 1997. The committee unanimously adopted an amendment prohibiting NASA from paying Russia to build components it had agreed to as its share, and requiring the President to decide by August 1 whether the U.S. should proceed with replacements for components that are in the "critical path." Start of construction is already delayed until at least the end of 1998 (WN 11 Apr 97). The amendment would also require NASA to certify that Mir is safe before another astronaut is sent to hang out in the rickety facility. Without the income derived from foreign tourists on Mir, Russia's space program could collapse.

2. LHC: SCIENCE COMMITTEE ATTACHES A FEW STRINGS TO DOE BILL.
The day before the chair of the House Science Committee, Jim Sensenbrenner, boarded a plane for a visit to CERN, the Committee marked up the FY 98 DOE authorization. The bill contained $35M for U.S. participation in the Large Hadron Collider, but it was amended to withhold any funding until the CERN Director reports to Congress on "the impacts of such funding on the operations and viability of United States high energy and nuclear facilities."

3. THE FY 98 BUDGET: IS THE 7% SOLUTION BEGINNING TO CATCH ON?
Congress has still not reached an agreement with the White House on a plan to balance the budget, but the Science Committee wasn't waiting. It completed work on ten authorization bills this week, including NSF, NASA and DOE. The bills call for FY 98 increases in the range of 7%. Last month when a coalition of scientific societies called for 7% across-the-board increase for research (WN 7 Mar 97), many observers scoffed that such an increase was unrealistic. It's a treacherous road from authorization in the spring to appropriation in the fall, but this is a good start.

4. DIGITAL AGENDA: BATTLE SHIFTING FROM TREATY TO LEGISLATION?
Last week the NRC released its report, "Bits of Power: Issues in Global Access to Scientific Data" (the "Berry Report"), portions of which had been circulated in advance to combat an attempt to impose restrictions by treaty (WN 20 Dec 96). With the treaty now apparently comatose, word is out that the database industry has assembled a war chest to push for a legislative remedy. Back when the database treaty was put on the table, Carlos Morehead (R-CA)introduced H.R.3531 with similar provisions. His bill went nowhere, but it's expected to be reintroduced in a more sanitized form with some sort of fair-use provision. Librarians argue that legislation should be held to a higher standard: Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution gives Congress the power to grant copyrights only "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts."



Bob Park can be reached via email at whatsnew@bobpark.org
THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND
Opinions are the author's and are not necessarily shared by the University, but they should be.