Friday, 20 Jan 95 Washington, DC


1. DRAFT RULES REQUIRE AUTOMATIC DECLASSIFICATION AFTER 25 YEARS!
Eighteen months ago, President Clinton directed the Information Security Oversight Office to lead an interagency task force to draft new national security classification rules (WN 23 Jul 93). New rules are desperately needed; Executive Order 12356, issued by President Reagan in 1982, has buried the government under an avalanche of classified documents; 2,000,000 new documents in the first year. The Reagan order can be paraphrased as "when in doubt classify," and even allows previously declassified documents to be reclassified. One year ago, the ISOO task farce submitted a draft calling for automatic declassification after 40 years-- long enough to allow middle-aged bureaucrats to go on to their reward before their mistakes would be let out of the vault. This week, the panel proposed a revised draft that would shorten the automatic declassification period to 25 years and set a tone of open government. No one is predicting when Clinton might sign it.

2. HOUSE BUDGET COMMITTEE WILL ASK "EVERYDAY PEOPLE" WHAT TO CUT!
John Kasich (R-OH) has announced field hearings in such places as Billings, MT, to hear from "the America that pays the bills...the lobbyists have had their chance." The hearings will be conducted "Oprah Winfrey style," according to a staffer, and participants will be screened to keep out "the artichoke growers association."

3. WHAT TO KILL FIRST? CONSERVATIVE THINK TANKS VOTE FOR DOE!
Wednesday, representatives of the Heritage Foundation, the CATO Institute and the Competitive Enterprise Institute testified on "Government Downsizing" before the Energy & Water Appropriations Subcommittee. They agreed that: the Department of Energy should be dismantled, energy supply R&D programs terminated and national labs privatized. Also testifying was the director of a GAO study that dumps on DOE management (WN 13 Jan 95). Significantly, not a single member of the subcommittee spoke up in defense of DOE.

4. CONGRESS PLUNGES INTO THE CONTROVERSY OVER AMERICAN HISTORY!
Yesterday, by a vote of 99-1, the Senate condemned the proposed US history standards and urged the National Education Standards and Improvement Council not to certify them. Sen. Slade Gorton (R-WA), who introduced the non-binding resolution, described the standards as "ideology masquerading as history" and asked if it is more important "to study Roseanne Arnold and Bart Simpson than Benjamin Franklin's discovery of electricity." Roseanne and Bart? Could it be? I checked: sure enough, they both made the cut-- Ben did not! Our own word search of the standards found only one reference to "science"--in a list of activities from which women have been excluded (WN 21 Oct 94). The lone dissenting vote was Bennett Johnston's; he wanted something with teeth in it. In the House, Peter Blute (R-MA) said there would be hearings on the planned Smithsonian exhibit on the use of the bomb (WN 2 Sep 94).

THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY (Note: Opinions are the author's and are not necessarily shared by the APS, but they should be.)


Bob Park can be reached via email at whatsnew@bobpark.org
THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND
Opinions are the author's and are not necessarily shared by the University, but they should be.