Friday, 27 May 94 Washington, DC

1. A "VISION FOR THE FUTURE OF HIGH-ENERGY PHYSICS" IS REVEALED.
HEPAP's "Future-Vision" subpanel, chaired by Sid Drell, delivered its report on schedule (WN 28 Jan 94). It calls for "constant- level-of-effort funding plus a $50M/year bump for three years" to support domestic programs, accelerator R&D for the next century, and "significant participation in the LHC." Even without a bump, the subpanel wants the US to join the LHC and make the necessary sacrifices at home. The report argues against converting the site of the deceased SSC into a superconducting magnet laboratory for high-energy physics because of its isolation from accelerators.

2. PORK-BARREL DEFENSE: BROWN GETS INFORMATION WITHOUT SUBPOENA.
Last month, George Brown, House SS&T Committee chair and nemesis of earmarkers, threatened to subpoena documents relating to pork in DOD programs. A week ago, Speaker Foley intervened and Brown got his documents. Among the tidbits: $72M was requested for Materials and Electronics Technologies; the appropriators added $193M--and earmarked every cent. No money was requested for In- tegrated Command and Control Technology; appropriators provided $160M anyway--and earmarked $186M, violating conservation of $.

3. TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER: ACADEMIC RESEARCH YIELDS ANTI-EMF DEVICE!
The EMX Corporation, formed in 1991 to commercialize technology developed at Catholic University in Washington, DC, is marketing an IBM compatible keyboard that "neutralizes the effect of EMF emissions from your computer." The keyboard works by generating EMF noise, which is said to block the harmful effects of coherent fields that emanate from computers. This remarkable technology was discovered by physicist Ted Litovitz at Catholic University's Vitreous State Laboratory. The VSL was one of the first academic pork projects; it's an ultramodern, 90,000-square foot R&D center built with a $14M DOE earmark, though few vitreous state research publications seem to come from the VS Lab. Litovitz was studying the effect of EMF on chicken embryos and mouse cells, which are not thought to be vitreous. But WHAT'S NEW is confident that you will suffer no ill effects from EMF if this keyboard is used with your computer. Or you could just hang garlic around your neck.

4. COMPETITION IS KEEN IN THE RACE TO NEUTRALIZE EFFECTS OF EMF!
The EMX device is not without competitors; Clarus Environmental Systems is offering a simple plug-in device that is also intended to "neutralize the negative effects of EMF emitted by computers." Oops! The Clarus researchers find that the biologically stressful effects of EMF are directly related to "disordered, random and chaotic energy in EMF fields." They fix the problem by cleaning up the noise, thus making the EMF more coherent. Clarus relies on advice from William Tiller, former chair of Stanford's Materials Department. Despite seemingly opposite approaches, WN assures its readers that the Clarus and EMX devices are equally effective.



Bob Park can be reached via email at whatsnew@bobpark.org
THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND
Opinions are the author's and are not necessarily shared by the University, but they should be.