Friday, 29 Oct 1993 Washington, DC

1. WHY DOES "ACADEMIC PORK" SEEM TO BE LESS APPETIZING THIS YEAR?
Earmarking funds for academic research facilities and projects is the modern way for members of appropriations committees to flex their muscles in front of the folks back home. For universities, it can mean big bucks without all the hassle of proposal writing; all they need is a Representative or Senator on an appropriations committee. A total of over $700M was earmarked for academic programs last year alone, and even after George Brown (D-CA) led a successful fight to strip earmarks from Energy and Water, they miraculously reappeared in Defense (WN 10-8-93). Brown has since gotten a rule change making this sort of end run more difficult. But the Defense Conference isn't finished--and appropriators are very resourceful. So far, however, academic earmarks are down by 78% in the Energy and Water Report, 87% the in HUD/VA/IA Report!

2. ALAS, AT LEAST ONE SENATOR HAS NEVER LOST HIS TASTE FOR PORK!
One of the remaining earmarks in the DOE budget is $4.6M for the Oregon Health Sciences University--which works out to $3,345.45 per student! And this was an off year! Over the last 10 years, OHSU has been forced to find ways to spend $90M in earmarks; that ranks it right up there with the University of Alaska and Iowa State. The OHSU earmark was slipped into the conference report by Senator Mark Hatfield (R-OR), the ranking minority member on Appropriations. Last year, the Senate Ethics Committee rebuked Hatfield for failing to disclose gifts from the University of South Carolina at a time when the University was seeking a $16M earmark for an engineering center. The University got the money; Hatfield's son got a full scholarship. This year, the Medical University of South Carolina got an earmark for $5.8M, courtesy of Senator Hollings (D-SC), who is also on Appropriations. The softest earmark simply urges the Midwest Superconductivity Consortium to include the University of Nebraska. I bet they will.

3. DESPITE A STRONG DISTASTE FOR PORK, MINNESOTA GOES AFTER MORE!
The University of Minnesota made off with $10M for a biomedical research building in 1991, but a University official expressed a strong aversion to earmarks and told the Minneapolis Star Tribune that the University has no strategy for seeking them. Even as he spoke, however, a memo was going to department heads asking them to get their earmark requests in by 1 Nov so the University's "federal lobbyist" could seek to have them inserted in the FY 95 Defense Appropriations Report, courtesy of Rep. Martin O. Sabo (D-MN). Sabo sits on the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee.

4. THE REVISED CONFERENCE REPORT ON THE SSC CLEARED BOTH CHAMBERS
and is on the President's desk. Rep. Boehlert (R-NY), arch SSC foe, wanted assurances that the stake had gone through the heart. Rep. Tom Bevill (D-AL), manager of the bill, confirmed that the site could not be "kept warm or mothballed." Roy Schwitters asked today that he be replaced as director of the SSC Laboratory.



Bob Park can be reached via email at whatsnew@bobpark.org
THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND
Opinions are the author's and are not necessarily shared by the University, but they should be.