Friday, 9 July 1993 Washington, DC

1. HOW MUCH SCIENCE IS ENOUGH? AS MUCH AS IT TAKES TO BE NUMBER
ONE! A new report by a National Academy panel proposes a clear, albeit chauvenistic, goal for American science policy: The U.S. should maintain clear world leadership in areas critical to our national interests--and at least stay even in other areas. The report, "National Goals for a New Era," produced by the Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy, calls for independent panels of experts to assess the comparative performance of U.S. research in major fields. No massive infusion of new funds would be needed, the authors claim, since we are spending too much in some areas. It is a startling proposal, coming amidst calls for increased international cooperation in research, but at least one highly placed politician seems to embrace the principle; in his endorsement of the SSC, President Clinton warned against compromising the U.S. position of leadership in science (WN 18 Jun 93).

2. RECOMMENDATION ON B-FACTORY PROPOSALS EXPECTED LATE NEXT WEEK.
The review panel, chaired by Stan Kowalski at MIT, has made its decision, but needs another week to finish its report. No need to hurry; the appropriation process for DOE is on hold while SSC supporters in the Senate try to devise a rescue strategy. Among the desperate schemes being discussed is a plan to block passage of an energy appropriation bill; a "continuing resolution" might keep the SSC alive, but it would be bad news for the B-factory.

3. NSF REQUEST: A NAIL THAT STICKS OUT ALWAYS GETS HAMMERED DOWN.
There was a glaring omission in the VA/HUD/IA appropriation bill that passed the House (WN 28 May 93); there was no money for the National Service Program. The President had requested $394M for the program, but Louis Stokes (D-OH), chair of the appropriations subcommittee, did not include it because an authorization had not been passed. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), Stokes' counterpart in the Senate, is waiting for the authorization, but where will she find $394M? The best bet is budgets that show increases. The $347M increase requested for NSF makes it the most obvious target.

4. "SPACE ADVERTISING PROHIBITION ACT" INTRODUCED IN BOTH HOUSES.
The act denys launch licenses for space billboards, bans import of products advertized on space billboards and asks the President to seek an international agreement banning space advertising. The legislation is a response to the public outcry over plans to put a mile-long inflatable billboard in Earth orbit (WN 16 Apr 93). The APS Executive Board has issued a statement opposing "any deployment of commercial advertising messages in Earth orbit."

5. SHEILA WIDNALL PICKED BY PRESIDENT TO BE AIR FORCE SECRETARY.
A professor of aeronautics and astronautics at MIT, Dr. Widnall is a Fellow of the APS and served on the APS Panel on Public Affairs from 1984-86. Her name has been mentioned since February, but no one accuses this White House of rushing into appointments.



Bob Park can be reached via email at whatsnew@bobpark.org
THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND
Opinions are the author's and are not necessarily shared by the University, but they should be.