Friday, 20 Nov 92 Washington, DC

1. COMMISSION ON THE FUTURE OF NSF REAFFIRMS NSF'S BASIC MISSION!
The brief Commission report, entitled "A Foundation for the 21st Century," was received by the NSB this morning. William Danforth, co-chair of the Commission, who is a physician by training, said that diagnosis comes before treatment. But the diagnosis was in the nature of, "the patient doesn't have a fever." As the report says, "Failures in the market place have not been a result of slow transfer of academic science to industry....The universi- ties and the NSF should complement rather than replace the roles of those engaged in technology development. Redirecting the NSF's activities from research and education would have little or no effect on the US competitive position in the near term, but would severely restrict prospects for the long term." Later, at a press conference, a puzzled reporter asked: "There is much reaffirma- tion; what is there in the report that calls for change?"

2. WALTER MASSEY SAW THE COMMISSION REPORT AS A CALL FOR CHANGE.
In Massey's view, the Commission recognized a need for "a greater integration of science and engineering research into society," a "more active use of partnerships, especially with industry," and support for research that "links science and technology." Massey remarked on the "gratifying" interest of the scientific community through the more than 800 letters that were ultimately received.

3. REVIEW PANEL EXONERATES LOW FREQUENCY ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS!
In 1989, a 3-part article in the New Yorker by professional fear-monger Paul Brodeur warned that EMF causes miscarriages, induces cancer and addles our brains, and the electric industry and the federal government have conspired to conceal the facts from the public. At the request of OSTP, Oak Ridge Associated Universities convened a highly qualified panel of scientists to conduct the most thorough independent review of the evidence to date. Last Friday, the panel reported that there is no convincing evidence that exposure to EMF poses a health hazard--and no justification for expanded research into EMF health effects. Panic generated by the Brodeur articles has already cost billions in law suits, relocated power lines, redesigned equipment, magnetic shielding and postponed expansion of power distribution. Will this report end the controversy? Of course not. An entire industry (includ-ing researchers) is now dependent on the fear of an EMF hazard.

4. AND SPEAKING OF WASTED BILLIONS, THE SHUTTLE MUST BE REPLACED
if the US space industry is to compete, according to a task group of the Vice President's Space Policy Advisory Board. Yesterday, the panel put shuttle launch costs at about $24,000/lb--6 times the price of gold on the spot market. But in a public forum at Texas A&M on Wednesday, Deputy NASA Administrator Aaron Cohen was still calling for adding another shuttle to the fleet. The task group did not call for a heavy lift vehicle, but for a system that could launch 10 to 25 tons; the shuttle capacity is 16 tons.



Bob Park can be reached via email at whatsnew@bobpark.org
THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND
Opinions are the author's and are not necessarily shared by the University, but they should be.