Friday, 17 April 1992 Washington, DC

1. SHOULD U.S. CITIZENS BE GIVEN PREFERENCE FOR ASSISTANTSHIPS?
A bill has been introduced by Rep. Paul Henry (R-MI) that would discourage the use of federal research funds to support foreign graduate students. Institutions using federal research funds to hire nonimmigrant alien students would have to certify that no qualified U.S. citizens or permanent residents were available. Hearings on the "American Math and Science Student Support Act" are scheduled for 29 April. The measure has no chance of passage on its own, but could show up as an amendment to something else.

2. SHOULD F.S.U. SCIENTISTS BE GIVEN PREFERENCE FOR IMMIGRATION?
Legislation to relax immigration requirements for scientists from the former Soviet Union is moving its way through the Senate. The number of scientists that would be eligible for special treatment was capped at 750 by a provision added by Sen. Kennedy (D-MA). Since physicists would be expected to make up a large fraction of the F.S.U. immigrants, the legislation would have a major impact on the job market for new PhD physicists--already the worst in 20 years. The U.S. produces about 1000 PhD physicists per year.

3. WITHERELL SUBPANEL MAKES TOUGH CHOICES IN HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS.
The big scores in high energy physics are: finding the top quark, exploring CP violation and discovering the Higgs boson or what-ever. In other words, high energy physicists need the injector upgrade at Fermilab, a B-factory and the Supercollider. Oh sure! A High Energy Physics Advisory Panel subgroup tried to figure out how to do that under three budget scenarios: (1) 2.5% per year above inflation, (2) level and (3) no adjustment for inflation (about -3.5%/yr). The subpanel made the SSC the highest priority. Under the middle scenario, construction of a B-factory at SLAC would be delayed to 1996, there would be cutbacks at Fermilab and Brookhaven and no new starts. Under the low budget scenario, SLAC and Brookhaven would cease accelerator operations by 1995. In an interview with the Chronicle of Higher Education, George Brown (D-CA), chair of the House Science Committee, reiterated what he said at the Physics Today roundtable (PT Feb 92): support for the SSC was conditioned on the assumption that it would not have a destructive effect on other DOE programs. "If it does," Brown said, "we'll be more than willing to change our position and oppose the SSC. It could happen as early as this year."

4. MASSEY PICKS WILLIAM HARRIS FOR ASSISTANT DIRECTOR POSITION.
Harris, who is currently Assistant to the Director, becomes the new Assistant Director for Mathematical and Physical Sciences, replacing DAVID SANCHEZ who is returning to Lehigh. A chemist, Harris has been at NSF since 1977; prior to that he was on the chemistry faculty at Furman. In other changes at NSF, ROBERT A. EISENSTEIN of the University of Illinois, a Fellow of the APS has been offered the position of Director of the Physics Division, replacing MARCEL BARDON, who takes over International Programs.



Bob Park can be reached via email at whatsnew@bobpark.org
THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND
Opinions are the author's and are not necessarily shared by the University, but they should be.