Friday, 4 September 1987 Washington, DC

1. SCIENTIFIC EXCHANGES WOULD REQUIRE THE APPROVAL OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
under the terms of a bill (H.R. 2990) introduced by Rep. Solomon (R-NY), whose district includes Rensselear Polytechnic Institute. The bill (H.R. 2990) covers agreements entered into by "any educational institution" involving the exchange or transfer of scientific or technological information with "certain foreign countries." These countries include not only the Warsaw Pact nations but "any country which the President may designate by executive order." If it became law, it would constitute by far the most massive intrusion of the federal government into the conduct of university research. Solomon introduced his bill in the wake of revelations that Japanese and Norwegian manufacturers had violated export control agreements in the sale of computer controlled milling machines to the Soviet Union. We predicted at that time (WN 3 Jul 87) that the emotions aroused by the incident would spawn new attempts to impose restraints on scientific freedom. Solomon's previous legislative initiatives include such heavy duty stuff as a resolution designating Fort Cralio, NY as the home of "Yankee Doodle."

2 . 24 STATES ENTERED THE SUPERCOLLIDER SWEEPSTAKES
before the proposal deadline at 2 p.m. on Wednesday. California staged a Hollywood cliff-hanger by deciding to submit its proposal only minutes before the deadline, despite the refusal of the state legislature to authorize the project. The California Collider Commission had sought to put pressure on the legislature by declaring it would not submit a proposal without authorization. The legislature, however, was split over the question of set-asides for companies headed by minorities or women, and refused to be stampeded. It was the Collider Commission that blinked, deciding at the last minute to go ahead without support from the legislature. This was no doubt disappointing to the other 23 states, since California has to be considered one of the front runners. A panel of the National Academies of Science and Engineering, headed by Ed Frieman, director of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, will evaluate the proposals on the basis of geology, regional resources, environment, setting, local conditions and utilities (WN 26 Jun 87). They are to recommend an unranked list of best sites to DOE's Energy System Acquisition Advisory Board by December. It won't be an easy deadline to meet. The Texas proposal weighed more than a ton, and Ohio submitted 60 boxes of documents.

3. PROPOSALS FOR THE NEW NSF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CENTERS
must be in by 15 Jan 87. Between 5 and 10 centers ranging from $0.5M to $5M annually for five years are expected to be approved in the spring, along with a number of $35,000 planning grants for proposals the following year. NSF Director Erich Bloch expects that a number of the proposals will focus on superconductivity.



Bob Park can be reached via email at whatsnew@bobpark.org
THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND
Opinions are the author's and are not necessarily shared by the University, but they should be.