Friday, 5 June 1987 Washington, DC

1. EXTENSION OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY TAX TO STUDENT EMPLOYEES
at colleges and universities is being urged by the Administration. The university employer and the student employee would have to contribute over 7% of a student's wages to Social Security (FICA) under the proposed change. Teaching and research assistants, already bloodied by changes in the income tax laws (WN 15 May 87), would find their meager living standards further eroded. In fact, in the cold logic of the government bureaucracy, ending the FICA exception for student employees is a natural consequence of having included them in the income tax. The historic rationale for the exception, which has been in the law since 1939, was that the bookkeeping would be a burden on the schools. However, since they are now required to withhold income taxes from student earnings anyway, it is argued that the additional burden of FICA will not be unreasonable. Congress must now decide whether to include the administration proposal in its revenue bill.

2 . THE FY 88 UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INITIATIVE OF THE DOD
was set at $142M in the DoD authorization bill reported out of the Senate Armed Services Committee. As we reported earlier (WN 17 Apr 87), the House Armed Services Committee called for $200M. The House also moved the funds to a separate line item in the Office of the Secretary of Defense, rather than continuing to divide them among the three services and DARPA. The more cautious Senate version would put just $50M in a new OSD line and divide the rest. Aside from an expression of pique at the conduct of the URI by the services, it is not clear that moving funds to OSD will have any real effect anyway. OSD has no machinery to administer the URI and may delegate the responsibility back to the services.

3. THE UNIVERSITY ROLE IN DEFENSE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
is discussed in a DoD report prepared for the Committees on Appropriations of the Congress. DoD basic research funding (category 6.1), which was 0.053% of the GNP in FY 63, is now only 0.023%. However, the university share of 6.1 funds has gone up from 34.2% to 54.5% in the last decade. The result, according to the report, is that DoD funding of basic research at universities today is comparable in real terms to that in the mid-60's. "Basic," however, seems to have undergone substantial redefinition in the intervening years, as indicated by the four areas of future defense research opportunities identified in the report: materials engineering, sensors, data and signal processing, and ocean science and engineering.

4. MERIT REVIEW AND GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF DOD UNIVERSITY RESEARCH
is dealt with in a separate companion report. The report argues that the goal should be expansion of national research capacity and not simply redistribution. It indicates that DoD support for basic research could be doubled without compromising quality.



Bob Park can be reached via email at whatsnew@bobpark.org
THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND
Opinions are the author's and are not necessarily shared by the University, but they should be.