Friday, April 23, 2010

1. CELL PHONES: FIVE BILLION ARE IN USE AROUND THE WORLD.

In spite of unsubstantiated reports that cell phone radiation increases the risk of brain cancer, sales soared in the first decade of the 3rd Millennium. Cell phones became a $1 trillion business. There was no corresponding increase in brain cancer, but perhaps there is a long latency period. Cancer victims have no way of knowing what caused their cancer, but the media had made their cell phones the suspect. The clear scientific conclusion that cell phone radiation could not be the cause, http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/93/3/166 , went largely unreported. In short, microwave photons do not have enough energy to create a mutant strand of DNA. That cant happen until you get to the blue limit of the visible spectrum. In the interest of full disclosure, let me state that although I own a cell phone I dont normally carry it, and cant even remember my number. I find cell phones to be rude and intrusive. My wife insists I carry it when I travel so I can dial 911 in an emergency. Thats OK.

2. COSMOS: THE COHORT STUDY ON MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS.

Yesterday, the cell-phone controversy was taken to a new and substantially lower level. The Cohort Study on Mobile Communications (COSMOS) was launched in the UK to determine whether microwave radiation from wireless devices can induce cancer. It will track 250,000 users for 30 years to catch any slow growing cancers. Note the built-in job protection. The study will look for neurological diseases such as Parkinsons and Alzheimers as well. Participants aged 18-69 are being recruited in Britain, Finland, the Netherlands, Sweden and Denmark. In Britain, COSMOS is inviting 2.4 million cell phone users to take part, and hoping 100,000 or so will accept. If they do the study really well, it will confirm Albert Einsteins 1905 explanation of the photoelectric effect, for which he was awarded the 1921 Nobel Prize. Of course, the photoelectric effect is confirmed thousands of times annually by students in elementary physics lab courses. If it is done badly, this tedious and expensive study could perpetuate the publics unfounded fear of radiation below the ultraviolet threshold. This must be stopped.

3. WALL STREET: DERIVATIVE-CRAZED PHYSICISTS 15 YEARS AGO.

Derivative trading bankrupted one of the richest counties in the nation, it destroyed the oldest bank in England and some think it could bring down the world banking system. Whos responsible for this mess? Physicists, according to 60-Minutes on CBS. "When Wall Street fell in love with computers 15 years ago it hired a lot of very smart people with PhDs in physics and mathematics, but not much background in finance," the reporter explains. "They sit around their computers concocting complex formulas no one can understand." A 60 Minutes financial expert picks up the theme: "Physicists do well with billiard balls, they do well with atoms. They do passably well with protons and electrons, but they dont do well with people they dont understand." The fund managers, bankers and investors, presumably, were powerless. (This is a verbatim copy from March 10, 1995.)

Bob Park can be reached via email at whatsnew@bobpark.org
THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND
Opinions are the author's and are not necessarily shared by the University, but they should be.