Friday, December 18, 2009

1. CYBERGOONS: THE ETHICS OF HACKING OTHER PEOPLES FILES.

"If you believe in scientific openness," warming critics wrote me, "you should be pleased that the climate-gate files became public." Well, I do believe in openness. The success and credibility of science is anchored in openness; new ideas and findings must be exposed to the scrutiny of other scientists. By contrast, governments insist on the need for diplomatic and military secrecy; the result of which is perpetual warfare. But contrary to the impression conveyed by the media, the U.S., thankfully, has no official-secrets act. Conscientious government workers, willing to risk their careers by leaking classified information, may be the only check on government excesses carried out behind a screen of national security http://bobpark.physics.umd.edu/WN03/wn100303.html. But it was no Daniel Ellsberg who hacked the climate-gate files. The unauthorized release of e- mail files from a climate unit at the University of East Anglia had no such high-minded purpose. It has the smell of goons hired by an Exxon or a Peabody Coal.

2. CERES: SO WHAT WAS IN THE CLIMATEGATE E-MAILS?

A hacked e-mail passage that was widely quoted in media accounts of climate- gate, begins: "The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't." Francisco Valero, Director of the Atmospheric Research Laboratory at the Scripps Institution for Oceanography, says the statement is totally correct. The problem began where most of our problems began: at the start of The Bush administration. Because Al Gore initiated it, the Bush administration postponed and eventually canceled the Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR), meant to continuously monitor Earth's radiance from the L1 point between Earth and Sun. Instead NASA began a program to get the information from low Earth orbit: CERES, Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES). The problem is that the low-Earth orbit satellite is so close that it sees only a narrow swath on each pass around the planet. Climate models require accurate radiance measurements over the diurnal cycle, and those data are not at hand. DSCOVR was designed to provide what the low-Earth orbit satellites cannot. An $18.7 billion NASA budget sent to the White House last Sunday includes only $5 million for continued refurbishing of DSCOVR. That is also a travesty.

3. CYBERWAR: INSURGENTS IN IRAQ HACK U.S. DRONES.

It's known as underestimating your enemy. Militants in Iran were intercepting live video feeds from U.S. Predator drones. The US hadnt bothered to encrypt the image data coming from the drones. Using off-the- shelf software programs such as SkyGrabber, available on the web for as little as $26, the Iranian-backed insurgents see what we see. Its reminiscent of the ways the Vietcong found to counter the huge US advantage in technology.

4. ARDIPITHECUS RAMIDOUS: BREAKTHROUGH OF THE YEAR.

Todays issue of Science Magazine names Ardis discovery as the Breakthrough of the Year http://bobpark.physics.umd.edu/WN09/wn100209.html. The 4.4 million year old skeleton completely revised our thinking of how we came to be, and how far we are from the Chimpanzee.

Bob Park can be reached via email at whatsnew@bobpark.org
THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND
Opinions are the author's and are not necessarily shared by the University, but they should be.