Friday, April 3, 2009

1. SPACE: A LETTER TO THE PRESIDENT ABOUT NASA SCIENCE.

Dear Mr. President: Last month you said the space agency is drifting and needs a mission "appropriate for the twenty-first century." The new Administrator, you said, should think about "the next great adventures and discoveries under the NASA banner." I know you've been busy with G20 stuff and haven't had time to name this visionary, so in an effort to help What's New did the thinking for whoever it will be: 1) Astronauts are a relic of the 1960's "space race" and a major obstacle to the continued exploration of space. Therefore the ISS, which serves no useful purpose anyway, should be given to China and the crew sent home on the Soyuz. Maybe astronauts could be awarded medals for courage in fighting the Cold War. 2) Global-warming critics insist climate change is the result of solar variations and is not anthropogenic. Therefore, NASA should move with due haste to locate DSCOVR at the unique Lagrange-1 vantage point to resolve this question. 3) The greatest quest in science is to find life to which we are not related. Therefore, NASA's robotic exploration of the solar system should be expanded to include the ocean moons of Jupiter. There should also be a ban on human visits to any planet that might harbor life; we're crawling with bugs. 4) The great discovery of this century is the existence of planets around other stars. The bad news is that we can't get to an exoplanet. The good news is they can't get here. Therefore we should employ the huge advances in optical technology to develop a new generation of advanced space telescopes capable of examining exoplanets for evidence of life.

2. SPENDING: BOTH HOUSES PASSED A BILL, BUT NOT THE SAME BILL.

The $3.5 trillion spending bill is good news for science. Major differences between House and Senate versions must be resolved by a Conference Committee, but it should not significantly affect science.

3. TEXAS CREATION: "SOMEBODY'S GOTTA STAND UP TO EXPERTS."

So spoke Don McLeroy, the dentist who chairs The Texas Board of Education which met this week to set new science standards. The issue that dominated the meeting was creationism. The experts lost. The tactic was to insert ambiguities that could be construed as calling for creationism to be taught. Creationists will use that to lobby textbook publishers. The publishers just want to sell books and Texas is a big market. McLeroy says he believes the sudden appearance of fossils supports the creationist view. What fossils? Texas used to float on a fossil ocean of oil. It has disappeared a lot faster than it formed.

4. ELECTRIC CARS: WHAT WE REALLY NEED ARE BETTER BATTERIES.

China says it plans to become the leading producer of hybrid and all electric vehicles. That's not good news for General Motors which aims to dig its way out of a hole by going more heavily into electric vehicles such as the plug-in Volt. The weak link in everybody's plan is the batteries

5. BS ABOUT BMS: IS NORTH KOREA FUELING A BALLISITIC MISSILE?

They're sure trying to make people think they are. They do this every so often to wring concessions out of the West. There is a call in Japan to shoot the missile down if it passes over their territory, but North Korea says they'll retaliate. The one thing we can be sure of is that the US won't shoot it down with interceptor missiles from silos in Alaska.

Bob Park can be reached via email at whatsnew@bobpark.org
THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND
Opinions are the author's and are not necessarily shared by the University, but they should be.