Friday, September 12, 2008

1. LHC: PROTONS CIRCULATE IN THE RACETRACK AT CERN.

The only collisions were with a few stray gas molecules that wandered into the vacuum of the 1.9 Kelvin beam tube. A beam was then successfully circulated in the opposite direction in an adjacent tube. There are no plans to collide the beams before October. In mid-December it will shut down until spring when serious colliding will begin. Meanwhile they will be "training" the magnets to withstand the forces at full field. The controversy over the danger of creating a devastating black hole only served to arouse public interest in a very basic science experiment. The public has every right to raise concerns about risks of science experiments. It was calmly and correctly dealt with by the courts, as it should have been.

2. DEFEND SCIENCE: SCIENTISTS STAND UP FOR EVOLUTION.

Excerpts from a statement warning that science in the U.S. "is under attack as never before," appeared as an ad in major newspapers this week. The statement www.defendscience.org has 2300 signatories including 14 Nobel laureates. It is inconceivable to scientists that any rational person could deny the truth of evolution. Why run the ad his week, you may ask?

3. THE PALIN INTERVIEW: CHARLIE, WHAT WERE YOU THINKING?

Dear Mr. Gibson: Having agreed to be "deferential" and being a nice guy besides, you were picked by Sarah Palin's handlers to conduct her first media interview since the nomination. You were not unaware of how little the nation knew of her. As the only reporter granted this privilege you had a responsibility. In view of her links to Pentecostalism, and what little we've been able to piece together about her views on other issues, I was praying, figuratively speaking of course, that you'd start right off with the big one: what is your opinion of Charles Darwin's theory of human evolution? All the others, sex education, stem cell research, choice, gay rights, church/state separation, are easy once that one out in the open. You greeted her politely, if at arms length, and went right to the first question: "Can you look the country in the eye and say, I have the experience and the ability to be not just Vice President, but perhaps President if the United States of America?" Isn't that the same question McCain was asked? "I do Charlie, I'm ready," she replied. What did you expect her to say? No, I'd better go back to school and find out how things work outside Alaska? For weeks we've heard not one unscripted word and all you can think to ask her is whether she's ready? And you wouldn't let it go. "When he asked you to be VP," you persisted, "did you think for a minute, 'N'?" If she did, she's not going to tell you on nationwide television. Are we supposed to spot look for beads of sweat or a shifty look in the eyes? "I did not," she said, "I thought yes, right off the bat". You wouldn't drop it, "And you didn't say to yourself, am I ready?" "I didn't hesitate, no." My God! Give it a rest Charlie. "Doesn't that take some hubris," you asked? "I answered yes," Palin responded, because I know you can't blink." It probably got better, but I was asleep by then.

Bob Park can be reached via email at whatsnew@bobpark.org
THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND
Opinions are the author's and are not necessarily shared by the University, but they should be.