Friday, September 14, 2007

1. WARNING! TURN OFF THE RADAR BEFORE THE OCEAN IGNITES.

All week long I've been getting URLs, for which I'm grateful, about some guy in Erie, PA who discovered a way to burn salt water. It's an AP story, but the warning signs are all there: Described as a "cancer researcher," the protagonist built an RF generator with the idea of killing cancers by heating metallic nanoparticles injected into the cancer. I guarantee that it's possible to kill cancers with RF, along with the host. Anyway, he's not exactly a cancer researcher, he's a retired TV station engineer who discovered that retirement sucks - but that's been discovered before. He then decided to see if his RF generator would desalinate water, but when he tried the water caught on fire. He needed a scientist. Instead, he found Rustum Roy, an emeritus chemistry professor at Penn State, who called it "the most remarkable discovery in water science in 100 years." That would include "polywater," which Roy fell for 40 years ago. Roy said that RF weakens chemical bonds, releasing hydrogen which burns. It's the Bush "hydrogen initiative" fallacy again (WN 31 Jan 03) . Must I now lecture a chemistry professor on thermodynamics? More energy is needed to free hydrogen than you get by burning it. The story was shunned by major news outlets, except, of course, Fox News, which did point out that Rustum Roy is also "a specialist in holistic medicine and Christian sexuality."

2. CLIMATE CRAP: A SEQUEL BY THE "SKEPTICAL ENVIRONMENTALIST."

Bjorn Lomborg's "Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist's Guide to Global Warming" is out. Well, yes it is getting warmer he finds, but aside from polar bears, it just means more beach weather. We've got bigger problems, he says. Instead of spending all that money trying to prevent warming, let's focus on making everyone rich so they can all buy air conditioners.

3. CLIMATE RESEARCH: HOW WILL CLIMATE CHANGE AFFECT PEOPLE?

A National Research Council Report released yesterday, says that's the big unanswered question. The report laments that, "The loss of existing and planned satellite sensors is perhaps the greatest single threat" to climate research.

4. A BIGGER PRIZE: THE GOOGLE LUNAR X PRIZE GOES ROBOTIC.

The $10M Ansari X Prize was so successful in bringing a few minutes of space sickness to the rich and bored that "The X Prize Foundation" decided to shoot for the Moon. A $25M million prize, paid for by internet giant Google, would be for an unmanned Moon landing of a rover capable of traveling 550 yards.

Bob Park can be reached via email at whatsnew@bobpark.org
THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND
Opinions are the author's and are not necessarily shared by the University, but they should be.