Friday, January 19, 2007

1. GRAND CANYON: A GORGE THAT SEPARATES SCIENCE FROM IDEOLOGY.

Three years ago, along with many others, WN covered the story of a creationist book on sale in Grand Canyon National Park that attributed the Grand Canyon to Noah's flood. The book is still on sale, and there are still plaques at scenic overlooks quoting Genesis. A 28 Dec 06 press release from PEER (Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility) charged that Park Service employees are not allowed to give visitors an official estimate of the age of the canyon. What's New, Doonesbury, Skeptic magazine and a host of other sources with skeptical credentials, bought into that story too. This time, however, the charge was apparently fabricated. We are grateful to Michael Shermer, editor of Skeptic magazine, for ferreting out the truth, and I join him in apologizing for being so easily duped.

2. OBSERVING EARTH: NAS CALLS FOR A "SURGE" IN CLIMATE RESEARCH.

On Monday, the National Academy of Sciences released a two-year study, "Earth Science and Applications from Space: National Imperatives for the Next Decade." We can count polar bears, stick thermometers in the ocean, and measure the hair on wooly caterpillars, but the only way to find out what's going on with global warming is to study Earth from space. The Academy report finds that NASA's earth science budget has fallen by 30 percent, while the number of operating Earth-observing instruments on NASA satellites will fall by 40 percent by 2010. The funds are being siphoned off to prepare for a manned science station on the moon. NASA seems unable to describe just what science will be done.

3. AN INCONVENIENT QUESTION: WHAT IS THE EARTH'S ENERGY BALANCE?

The Earth's albedo, or reflectivity, is fundamental to global climate. We don't know what it is. The only instrument capable of measuring and continuously monitoring the albedo is the Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR). Already built and paid for, it sits in a warehouse at Goddard SFC waiting to be delivered to the Lagrange-1 point, about a million miles in the direction of the sun. We understand why President Bush may not like DSCOVR. But not much has been heard from Congress or the public.

4. CONTINUING RESOLUTION: IT'S GOING TO BE A VERY LONG TWO YEARS.

The Republican controlled Congress failed to get its work done in the fall, making some sort of continuing resolution almost inevitable. "Dear Colleague" letters went out this week urging appropriators to give priority to science in a continuing resolution, but a CR is by its nature a mindless steam roller. Meanwhile, the President is expected to make balancing the budget without raising taxes the main theme of his State of the Union address next Tuesday, even as he orders a "surge" in Iraq. Look for RIFs at DOE facilities and shortened operating time for accelerators and light sources. RHIC may not run at all in 2007.

Bob Park can be reached via email at whatsnew@bobpark.org
THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND
Opinions are the author's and are not necessarily shared by the University, but they should be.