Friday, September 9, 2005

1. KATRINA: THE COST OF THE HURRICANE RECOVERY KEEPS GROWING.

The New York Times today estimated the recovery costs at more than $100B. So far, Congress has approved $51.8B in spending. Meanwhile, there have been huge tax cuts for some of us. So the focus of today's What's New is on unanticipated expenditures.

2. ZERO-POINT ENERGY: KATRINA REVIVES A STRUGGLING INDUSTRY.

Even as gas approaches the price of bottled water, Katrina has cut oil production in the Gulf and shut down key ports. Drilling in the ANWAR faces a key vote, and the President has ordered oil released from the strategic reserve. So where is the free-energy industry? Right on schedule. The San Francisco Chronicle had a rather skeptical article in the business section this week about a "clean, inexhaustible energy source." However, we don't do perpetual-motion in the 21st Century. Nowadays we tap zero-point energy (WN 2 Aug 02), and Magnetic Power Inc says it's "on the verge" of it. "We are still having trouble making it repeatable," the CEO said. "All we know is that we're seeing more energy output than input, what else could it be?" Is this sounding vaguely familiar? The Air Force sank $600,000 in the company. Last year, the AF was investing in teleportation (WN 29 Oct 04). Any time now we can expect to hear new claims for cold fusion.

3. HYDROGEN ECONOMY: "NEW CATALYST PRODUCES HYDROGEN FROM WATER."

Well, not exactly. The prospect of a hydrogen economy hinges on the ability to produce hydrogen economically. Thirty years ago, an inventor named Sam Leach claimed to have invented a car that ran on water. He said it used a secret catalyst to dissociate water. That would be thermodynamically impossible. But a brief report in Scientific American last week implied a new rhenium catalyst might dissociate water. It was based on an article in the Journal of the American Chemical Society, but the title of the story in SA was misleading. The hydrogen was from catalytic oxidation of organosilanes. Cars still won't run on water.

4. MISSILE DEFENSE: WE DON'T SEEM TO HEAR MUCH ABOUT IT LATELY.

Maybe it's no longer needed; after all, the election is over. A report from the General Accounting Office this week doesn't ask whether it works. It didn't the last we heard 8 months ago, (WN 18 Feb 05). GAO concludes that funds are needed to sustain the system to 2011. Why sustain it? In 1979, in Grand Forks, ND, a worthless missile defense system was turned off 24 hours after it was declared completed.

5. MARS: TESTING A FISSION-POWERED ROCKET ENGINE TO SEND HUMANS.

The problem is finding a place to test it here on Earth. In the first test of a nuclear rocket engine in 1965, the exhaust was just aimed skyward. NASA will not be allowed to vent to the atmosphere this time. Design and operation of a Ground Test Facility capable of removing fission products from the exhaust is a major engineering project. Why is it we're going to Mars?

Bob Park can be reached via email at whatsnew@bobpark.org
THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND
Opinions are the author's and are not necessarily shared by the University, but they should be.