Friday, July 12, 2002

1. SPACE STATION: SCIENCE PANEL WANTS TO SEE A LITTLE SCIENCE.
The International Space Station was sold to Congress as science, but a $5B budget shortfall halted work on two of the modules and the crew was cut from 7 to a Mir-sized 3 (WN 9 Nov 01). It was that or hire Arthur Anderson to do the accounting. The need for budgetary discipline also led to a bean counter from OMB, Sean O'Keefe replacing Dan Goldin (WN 16 Nov 01). In March, O'Keefe named a 20 member panel of scientists-turned-administrators, mostly from the life sciences, to assess the ISS research priorities. The panel reported to the NASA Advisory Council on Wednesday that there is no research on the ISS to assess. The crew of 3 can barely find time to clean the toilet. So the panel called for a larger crew, completion of the unfinished modules, and more resupply missions. In other words, undo everything done in March to deal with budget overruns. What were they thinking? It makes no sense to have a research laboratory that does no research, but $5B is a lot of money. Do we want to spend triple the NSF research budget to have a bigger crew? The only thing the ISS has going for it is micro-gravity, but decades of micro- gravity research on the Shuttle and Mir had no discernable impact on any field of science. Congress may be in a mood to scrap the giant money-shredder; scientists should plead with them to do it.

2. MISCONDUCT: INQUIRY AT BELL LABS IS BROADENED.
The scope of the investigation into possible data fabrication has expanded to include four papers dealing with superconductivity. As with the dozen or so papers that initiated the inquiry, involving the use of organic molecules in microelectronics, the lead author on the novel superconductivity papers was Jan Hendrik Schon. This is a trip into unfamiliar territory for physicists, who have seen few cases of outright fabrication. However, the Council of the American Physical Society has issued formal statements dealing not only with fabrication and plagiarism, but with far more prevalent forms of misconduct, such as automatic co-authorship of someone who has made no substantive contribution to the work: Integrity in Physics http://www.aps.org/statements/87_1.cfm Professional Conduct http://www.aps.org/statements/91_8.cfm

3. YUCCA MOUNTAIN: THE DEBATE FINALLY WENT CRITICAL.
By a vote of 60 to 39, the Senate overrode Nevada's veto of a plan to consolidate nuclear waste. There will be court challenges. The most irresponsible attempt to block the repository came from physicists. In 1995 two Los Alamos physicists, who just happened to favor a plan to transmute fissile waste in an accelerator, claimed there was a danger that the mountain could go critical. The only support for their claim came from physicists at Savannah River, who just happened to favor vitrification of stored waste.

Christy Fernandez assisted with this week's What's New.



Bob Park can be reached via email at whatsnew@bobpark.org
THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND
Opinions are the author's and are not necessarily shared by the University, but they should be.